At the forefront of modern artificial intelligence are two approaches: symbolic AI and subsymbolic AI. The two approaches have distinct characteristics, methodologies, and problem-solving strategies, and both have been the subject of extensive research and development. Symbolic AI is based on the manipulation of symbols or abstract representations of knowledge, rules, and concepts to solve problems and make decisions. Subsymbolic AI, on the other hand, is based on the simulation of neural network architectures that emulate the learning and decision-making processes of biological organisms. The symbolic approach has been widely adopted in fields ranging from expert systems to natural language processing, while the subsymbolic approach has seen significant breakthroughs in areas such as computer vision and deep learning. In this essay, we will delve into the key differences between symbolic and subsymbolic AI, explore their strengths and weaknesses and discuss which approach is best suited to solving different types of problems.

Definition of symbolic AI

Symbolic AI, also called rule-based or traditional AI, refers to an artificial intelligence approach that relies on a base of knowledge represented in the form of symbols or rules. These symbols, which can be in the form of words, numbers, or other abstract representations, are manipulated by a computer program to simulate human reasoning and problem-solving capabilities. In other words, the symbolic AI approach aims to replicate the way humans solve problems, using logical deduction and inference based on a set of explicitly defined rules. The development of symbolic AI systems typically requires significant human input, including the encoding of knowledge and rules, and the creation of specialized algorithms to manipulate and reason over these symbols. While symbolic AI has been successful in certain applications, such as expert systems or natural language processing, it has limitations in dealing with noisy or ambiguous data, and struggles to learn from experience or adapt to changing environments.

Definition of subsymbolic AI

Subsymbolic AI, on the other hand, refers to the approach that focuses on creating intelligent behavior by simulating the behavior in biological systems. It deals with the processing and analysis of data using numerical methods and statistical models to solve problems without the need for explicit rules or algorithms. Subsymbolic AI technologies include artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and swarm intelligence. Neural networks are models that represent biological neurons and their interactions, which are used in data analysis and pattern recognition tasks. Fuzzy logic is a mathematical system that deals with imprecise or uncertain data. Genetic algorithms are optimization algorithms that imitate biological evolution to find advantageous solutions to problems. Swarm intelligence refers to the collective behavior of decentralized, self-organized systems, such as ants or bees, which can be used in optimization tasks. Subsymbolic AI is particularly well-suited for solving non-deterministic, complex, and dynamic problems that require non-linear or continuous solutions.

Significance of comparing the two approaches

Comparing the two approaches of Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI is a significant step in understanding the development of artificial intelligence. The traditional approach of Symbolic AI focused on the manipulation of symbols and logical reasoning, while Subsymbolic AI relied on the analysis of patterns and statistical algorithms. Comparing these two approaches helps in highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each and identifying the areas where they can complement each other. It also brings into focus the diverse applications of AI in different fields, and how each approach can be suited to specific domains. Comparing Symbolic and Subsymbolic AI helps in devising a more comprehensive framework for AI development, as both approaches can be used together to create more sophisticated programs. Furthermore, this comparison also helps in addressing the challenges that each approach faces and identifying the areas that need more research and development.

Furthermore, subsymbolic AI systems have a more human-like cognitive system, known as neural networks. The neural network learning process is similar to the human learning process. By using self-experience, recognizing patterns, and finding correlations, neural networks can learn to process complex information. This feature makes subsymbolic AI ideal for tasks such as speech or image recognition, where patterns and associations are essential. Subsymbolic AI aims to develop a system that can learn and adapt to new information, making it more versatile than symbolic AI systems. However, subsymbolic AI has limitations. It lacks explanation and interpretability, which means it can be challenging to understand how it arrives at a solution. The complex algorithms used in subsymbolic AI systems can make them difficult to modify or adapt. Therefore, subsymbolic AI requires a thorough understanding of neural networks and deep learning techniques to be effective.

Symbolic AI

Symbolic AI is a branch of Artificial Intelligence that focuses on representing and manipulating knowledge using symbols and rules to make inferences and make decisions. It involves creating a complex system of rules, symbols, and logical relationships between them to simulate human reasoning. Symbolic AI is primarily concerned with the manipulation of abstract concepts to arrive at a logical conclusion, and it is highly reliant on formal logic and mathematical symbols. This approach to AI is commonly used in expert systems, where it can provide a high level of knowledge representation and problem-solving capabilities to applications. However, the symbolic approach has its limitations, particularly when it comes to dealing with uncertainty and complexity. As a result, Subsymbolic AI, which focuses on neural networks and pattern recognition rather than symbolic representation, has gained significant popularity in recent years as a more effective approach for handling large amounts of data and complex decision-making processes.

History and development

The development of connectionist systems has allowed for a more flexible and adaptive approach to artificial intelligence. Unlike symbolic AI, subsymbolic AI does not rely on explicit, predetermined rules as the basis for reasoning. Instead, these systems use machine learning algorithms to build increasingly complex representations of patterns and relationships from vast amounts of data. This approach has proven effective in a wide variety of tasks, such as image and speech recognition. The advancements in subsymbolic AI have led to the development of deep neural networks, a class of algorithms that can learn how to perform complex and diverse tasks by approximating the behavior of interconnected neurons in the human brain. These deep networks can effectively model a vast number of relationships between inputs and outputs, making them a powerful tool for many applications, including natural language processing, autonomous vehicles, and medical diagnosis.

Characteristics and features

Characteristics and features of subsymbolic AI systems are also noteworthy. Subsymbolic AI approaches are grounded in the concept of neural networks, where nodes in the network are interconnected to enable programmed tasks. Neural networks are typically composed of millions of artificial neurons that function as signal processing units. Subsymbolic systems are characterized by their ability to learn features and patterns from data, an approach that has been used in image recognition applications and natural language processing. The downside to this approach is the lack of interpretability, as the inner workings of the network cannot be clearly explained. Additionally, training subsymbolic models can be computationally expensive and requires large datasets. The strengths and weaknesses of each approach ultimately come down to the specific application domain and its requirements. In some cases, a symbolic approach may be more suitable, while in others, subsymbolic approaches may be the better choice.

Examples of symbolic AI

Examples of symbolic AI include expert systems, natural language processing, and robotics. Expert systems use a knowledge base to provide responses to user queries based on logical rules. Natural language processing involves teaching computers to understand and respond to human language, including voice recognition. Robotics is the use of programmable machines that can perform tasks automatically, such as manufacturing or assembling products. Symbolic AI has also been used in the field of medicine, including the development of diagnostic systems that are designed to assist doctors in making diagnoses by analyzing patient data. Another application of symbolic AI is in the field of finance, including the development of expert systems to help guide investment decisions. While symbolic AI has been successful in addressing specific problems, it has limitations in handling large amounts of data, and its development is often laborious and complex.

Subsymbolic AI is an approach that deals with the notion of creating computational models that are inspired by the working of the human brain. It aims at developing machine learning models that are capable of learning and adapting according to the environment, without explicit programming. Subsymbolic AI uses deep neural networks, which are composed of small processing units called neurons, which work in tandem to process input data to generate an output. Unlike symbolic AI, which requires domain-specific knowledge and a priori understanding of the problem, subsymbolic AI relies on data, learning through the patterns present and adaptability to the environment. The advantage of this approach is that machines can learn on their own, detecting and adjusting to new patterns, eliminating the need for human intervention. However, the drawback is that subsymbolic AI models can be complex and hard to understand, as they do not operate at a symbolic level, making it hard to interpret their decision-making process.

Subsymbolic AI

Subsymbolic AI, also known as connectionist or neural network AI, is a departure from the rule-based approach of symbolic AI. Its foundation rests on the concept of neurons, which are interconnected and work together to complete a task. These networks are capable of parsing large amounts of information, recognizing patterns, and detecting changes. They can learn from examples and continuously adjust their connections for improved performance, a process called training. Subsymbolic AI systems can be used for tasks such as image recognition, speech recognition, and natural language processing. They work by processing data through layers of nodes, simulating the way the human brain processes information. This subsymbolic approach has led to breakthroughs in areas such as machine learning and computer vision. For example, deep learning, a subfield of neural networks, has enabled algorithms to recognize images and texts with a high degree of accuracy. Subsymbolic AI is essential for creating more human-like and adaptable intelligent systems.

Symbolic AI can be traced back to the early days of computer science. Researchers aimed to develop a system that could process natural language, understand logic and reasoning, and solve complex problems on its own. As a result, they focused on developing a knowledge-based approach, where the system would use a set of rules and symbols to represent knowledge and manipulate them to derive new information. This approach gained popularity in the 1960s and 70s and led to the development of early expert systems like MYCIN and DENDRAL. However, the knowledge-based approach had its limitations and could not handle uncertainty and ambiguity, which led to the emergence of subsymbolic AI techniques like neural networks and evolutionary algorithms. Today, symbolic AI is still a popular field of research, and its applications can be seen in various fields like natural language processing, robotics, and computer vision. of symbolic and subsymbolic AI systems are quite distinct.

Symbolic AI systems deal with symbols, programmed rules, and knowledge representation schemes. Such systems operate on discrete and structured approaches that enable humans to comprehend and analyze the logic behind a machine's decision-making process. In contrast, subsymbolic AI systems employ a connectionist methodology, which comprises an extensive network of artificial neurons arranged in layers, classified as deep learning algorithms. The modus operandi of subsymbolic AI systems involves repeated exposure to vast amounts of data to recognize patterns gradually, constantly improving accuracy. These techniques require no explicit rules or knowledge representation, and their outcomes are statistical and probabilistic. Symbolic AI systems perform well in cases where the problem is well-defined and has a simple solution. Subsymbolic AI systems are more suited for complicated problems that require processing massive amounts of information. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive and can be used collaboratively to harness the strengths of both systems.

Examples of subsymbolic AI

Examples of subsymbolic AI include Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), deep learning algorithms, and decision trees. ANNs are modeled after the structure and function of the human brain and are used in image and voice recognition, natural language processing, and autonomous vehicles. Deep learning algorithms are a subset of ANNs that use multiple layers to analyze data and make predictions, and are used in applications such as speech recognition, natural language processing, and image recognition. Decision trees are used in medical diagnosis, credit scoring, and fraud detection, and are a type of algorithm that uses a tree-like structure to represent decisions and their possible consequences. Subsymbolic AI approaches are often used in areas where the problem is complex and difficult to solve using traditional rule-based systems. These systems are effective because they can adapt and learn from their environment, improve their accuracy, and make decisions based on patterns rather than explicit rules.

In conclusion, both Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI have their own strengths and weaknesses which can be utilized in different applications. While Symbolic AI is adept at reasoning and representing knowledge explicitly, it is criticized for its brittleness and inability to learn from data. On the other hand, Subsymbolic AI provides a more implicit way of representing knowledge and is useful for tasks that require pattern recognition and learning from data, however, it may not be suitable for more complex reasoning tasks. Hybrid approaches that combine both Symbolic and Subsymbolic AI techniques have been proposed to leverage the strengths of both and overcome their limitations. Ultimately, the choice between these approaches will depend on the specific problem and domain being tackled. As AI continues to evolve and advance, it is likely that new techniques and approaches will emerge, further expanding the capabilities and potential applications of artificial intelligence.


In conclusion, Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI are two of the most commonly used approaches in artificial intelligence. Symbolic AI, also known as rule-based AI, helps in developing knowledge-based systems that use symbols and formal logic to reason about problems. On the other hand, Subsymbolic AI employs techniques such as neural networks, fuzzy logic, and evolutionary computation that are grounded in mathematics and statistics. While both approaches are effective in solving complex problems, Symbolic AI is best suited for expert systems that require human input and domain-specific knowledge. Subsymbolic AI is ideal for applications that require continuous learning, such as natural language processing, speech recognition, and image recognition tasks. Therefore, it is essential to consider the problem requirements and constraints before deciding which approach to use. Ultimately, the success of an AI application depends on selecting the appropriate approach that best suits the requirements of the problem.

Strengths and weaknesses of symbolic AI

One of the main strengths of symbolic AI is its ability to support logical reasoning and deduction. Symbolic AI systems are capable of processing vast amounts of data and generating conclusions based on pre-defined rules and knowledge. Additionally, symbolic AI is often viewed as more transparent and interpretable compared to subsymbolic AI approaches. However, a major weakness of symbolic AI is its inflexibility in handling complex and uncertain real-world scenarios. Symbolic AI systems rely heavily on explicit representations of knowledge and may struggle when faced with incomplete or inconsistent data. Furthermore, symbolic AI approaches tend not to work well with sensory input such as images or speech, which must be pre-processed into symbolic forms before being processed by the system. These limitations have led to the development of subsymbolic AI approaches, which attempt to address some of the drawbacks of symbolic AI by leveraging machine learning techniques and neural networks.

Strengths and weaknesses of subsymbolic AI

Subsymbolic AI has its own set of strengths and weaknesses. One of its major strengths is its ability to learn from data and make decisions based on patterns, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. This has proven particularly useful in areas such as image and voice recognition, natural language processing, and robotics. Additionally, subsymbolic AI systems require less domain knowledge and can perform well even in ambiguous situations. However, one of the major weaknesses of subsymbolic AI is its lack of transparency and interpretability. This means that it can be difficult to understand how and why the AI system arrived at a certain decision, making it challenging to identify and fix errors. Additionally, subsymbolic AI is limited in its ability to reason and engage in tasks that require high-level cognition, such as planning, decision-making, and creativity. Overall, subsymbolic AI has shown promise in certain domains but is not without limitations.

Practical applications and limitations of both approaches

The practical applications and limitations of both approaches are crucial in determining which approach is suitable for a particular problem. Symbolic AI is suitable for tasks that are solely based on rule-based reasoning and human-level decision-making processes such as natural language processing, expert systems, and robotics. However, it has limitations in areas such as perception, uncertainty, and machine learning. On the other hand, subsymbolic AI is ideal for tasks that require low-level processing such as image processing, speech recognition, and pattern recognition. It provides an efficient and effective approach to handle complex, nonlinear problems that cannot be handled by symbolic AI. Although subsymbolic AI lacks human-like reasoning processes, it has the advantage of being adaptive, self-learning, and constantly optimizing itself for better performance. Despite their distinct features, it is essential to recognize that the practical applications of both approaches are not mutually exclusive, and combining them can, in some cases, lead to better performance.

Symbolic AI and subsymbolic AI approach artificial intelligence with distinct philosophies. Symbolic AI relies on logical reasoning and knowledge representation to process information. It emphasizes the use of symbols to represent objects and their relationships, which act as building blocks for higher-level concepts. In contrast, subsymbolic AI utilizes algorithms that process information in a more incremental fashion, relying on patterns and statistical analysis. This approach relies less on symbolic representation and more on processing sensory information to develop an understanding of the world. Symbolic AI can easily be programmed by humans, allowing them to define rules and axioms that help to make decisions. Subsymbolic AI, on the other hand, requires a large amount of data to be fed into the system to learn and develop a better understanding of the world. Ultimately, both approaches to AI have their strengths and weaknesses, but they offer complementary avenues for developing intelligent systems.


The debate between symbolic AI and subsymbolic AI is an ongoing one, with proponents on both sides. Symbolic AI proponents argue that it is the only way to achieve true intelligence and understanding, as it relies on human-like cognitive processes such as reasoning and logic. They view subsymbolic AI as limited in its ability to produce truly intelligent behavior, as it is largely based on statistical algorithms and lacks the ability to reason abstractly.

On the other hand, subsymbolic AI enthusiasts argue that it offers a more flexible and powerful means of achieving intelligence. By mimicking the ways in which the brain processes information, it is better able to handle the complexity and variability of real-world situations. Moreover, it is less dependent on hand-coding and is able to learn from experience, thereby achieving greater accuracy and adaptability over time.

Ultimately, the debate between symbolic and subsymbolic AI is not one that can be easily resolved. Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and the relative importance of each will depend on the specific application at hand. Nevertheless, understanding the debate and the merits of each approach can help drive progress towards the development of more advanced and effective AI systems.

Perspectives on the superiority of symbolic AI

Overall, advocates of symbolic AI view their approach as superior due to its basis in logic and reasoning, which they see as fundamental to human cognition. To these proponents, the rule-based systems of symbolic AI offer the ability to apply logical reasoning to complex problems, ultimately leading to better decision making. Furthermore, symbolic AI is more transparent in its decision making processes, as it operates based on explicit representations of knowledge and rules. In contrast, subsymbolic AI approaches, such as neural networks, are often criticized for their "black box" nature, in which decision making processes are opaque and difficult to comprehend. However, critics of symbolic AI argue that it is limited by its inability to handle ambiguity and lack of robustness in the face of incomplete or noisy data. Additionally, some argue that the rule-based nature of symbolic AI can be overly rigid and inflexible, limiting its ability to adapt to novel situations.

Perspectives on the superiority of subsymbolic AI

Another perspective on the superiority of subsymbolic AI is the argument that it mirrors how the human brain processes information. Subsymbolic AI models, such as deep neural networks, operate similarly to how neurons in the human brain fire and propagate signals. This allows subsymbolic AI to develop more complex and nuanced patterns, making it effective for tasks such as image and speech recognition. In addition, subsymbolic AI can adapt and learn more efficiently compared to symbolic AI, which requires extensive programming and hand-tuning of rules for various tasks. However, critics argue that subsymbolic AI lacks transparency in how it makes decisions, preventing humans from understanding how the system arrives at its conclusions. Furthermore, subsymbolic AI may suffer from a lack of robustness and generalizability, requiring extensive training data and potentially failing in situations that fall outside of its training set.

Debate on the future of AI

Debate on the future of AI remains a contentious topic, with some experts believing that AI systems will eventually surpass human intelligence, while others argue that such claims are overstated. Some prominent figures, such as entrepreneur Elon Musk and physicist Stephen Hawking, have warned that AI poses an existential threat to humanity if it is not properly controlled. However, others have countered that these fears are based on science fiction rather than reality. They argue that the real risks of AI are more mundane, such as job displacement and privacy concerns. Despite these disagreements, most experts agree that AI will continue to play an increasingly important role in our lives in the coming decades. As such, it is imperative that we develop effective governance frameworks to ensure that AI is used ethically and for the benefit of society as a whole.

Another approach to artificial intelligence is subsymbolic AI, which differs from symbolic AI in its philosophy and methodology. Instead of relying on logical representation and rule-based systems, subsymbolic AI emphasizes the use of neural networks and machine learning algorithms to make sense of complex data sets. These systems are designed to adapt and learn from experience, allowing them to improve their performance over time. Subsymbolic AI is often used in applications such as image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive modeling. While subsymbolic AI has shown great promise, particularly in the field of deep learning, it has also faced criticism for its lack of transparency and interpretability. Critics argue that the black box nature of subsymbolic AI makes it difficult to understand how decisions are being made, raising concerns about bias and accountability. Despite these challenges, subsymbolic AI remains an important area of research and development in the field of artificial intelligence.


In conclusion, it is fair to say that the debate between symbolic AI and subsymbolic AI remains unresolved. While some experts believe that symbolic AI will never be able to achieve true intelligence, others argue that it is essential for understanding higher-level thought processes in humans. Subsymbolic AI, on the other hand, has demonstrated significant success in learning and pattern recognition tasks, but there are still challenges to overcome when it comes to interpretability and explainability of the systems. As technology continues to advance, it is possible that a hybrid approach to AI that incorporates both symbolic and subsymbolic methods will emerge as the best way forward. Ultimately, the success of any AI system will be determined by its ability to solve real-world problems and make our lives better, regardless of the underlying philosophy or architecture.

The importance of considering both approaches

In conclusion, it is important to consider both the symbolic and subsymbolic approaches in the development of AI. Symbolic AI is advantageous in situations that require logical reasoning and problem-solving that can be expressed using rules and symbols, whereas subsymbolic AI excels in areas where pattern recognition and learning from experience are important, such as speech recognition, image recognition, and natural language processing. Another advantage of using both approaches is that they can be combined to create hybrid models that are more effective in solving complex problems. For instance, subsymbolic AI can be used for feature extraction in image recognition, while symbolic AI is used for classification. Therefore, understanding the strengths and limitations of each approach and applying them in a complementary manner can lead to more comprehensive and intelligent AI systems that can overcome the challenges and limitations of individual approaches.

Key takeaways from comparing Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI

Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI both have their strengths and weaknesses when it comes to different applications. Symbolic AI, with its rule-based system, works well in situations where the problem-solving process requires a large number of rules and is well-defined. In contrast, Subsymbolic AI, with its focus on learning, is better suited to deal with situations where the problem is not well-defined and where data can be used to generate new insights. Moreover, while Symbolic AI requires expert knowledge to create a set of well-defined rules, Subsymbolic AI only needs raw data to learn from. On the other hand, Symbolic AI has a more deterministic and transparent approach, allowing developers to understand how the AI model reaches its conclusions. In comparison, Subsymbolic AI is more of a black box, making it difficult to understand how the model comes up with its results. Ultimately, the choice between Symbolic AI and Subsymbolic AI depends on the specific application and the goals of the project.

Possible implications for the future of AI

Possible implications for the future of AI go beyond the basic concerns of economic development and labor displacement. AI development and integration into our daily lives raise deeper questions about our own values and the concept of human autonomy. AI machines are not just tools or assistants, but they have the potential to become autonomous agents that can learn, communicate and make decisions on their own. Such developments would affect the traditional foundation of morality that mandates the distinction between intentional agency and unintentional consequences. If AI machines become ubiquitous in society, they could not only challenge our traditional concepts of responsibility and accountability but also produce genuinely independent AI entities. It is vital that we consider the implications of creating such entities and what kind of ethical considerations should be applied to AI development. We need to be careful to ensure that such entities do not apprehend us as a threat and that we do not perceive them in the same way.

Kind regards
J.O. Schneppat